Cancel
OK

You have successfully logged out.

Hello !
chevron_right My profile
chevron_right To My B. Braun overview
Logout
What are you looking for?
close close

Waste reduction

The sustainable hospital: Waste reduction best practice tip

As healthcare institutions seek ways to make their operations more sustainable and contribute to the fight against climate change, one very simple metric to focus on is total plastic waste generated by a facility.

Medical Professional

This information is meant for medical professionals only. Please confirm that you are a medical professional before accessing the information.

Confirm Yes, I am a health care professional. Cancel No, I am not a health care professional.

Any change in healthcare operations that brings down this total waste figure means reduced use of raw materials in the production process, reduced costs for waste disposal or recycling, and ultimately reduced CO2 emissions from waste incineration. 

 

When an option arises to eliminate a whole stream of single-use waste, it’s an opportunity that healthcare practitioners and managers naturally take seriously.

CSSD Manager compares sterile containers vs. single-use wraps waste

Processing sterile goods for the OR

The ongoing performance of operations in the hospital depends on an uninterrupted supply of newly sterilized reusable equipment, typically provided by a facility’s central sterile services department (CSSD).

Single-use wrap

There are two widely used methods of handling instruments and equipment during this autoclave sterilization process in the CSSD.

 

One method works with single-use wrap (often called “blue wrap”) that is used to pack the instruments while they are sterilized and then stored.

The other method uses reusable containers (typically called rigid sterile containers or “RSCs”) for this same packing and storage function.

 

Blue wrap delivers sufficient sterilization performance, but there is a dramatic difference in the quantity of downstream waste generated by these two procedures.

Reusable sterile container

Waste quantity comparison

Sterilisation with blue wrap vs. AESCULAP® sterile containers

  • Annual surgeries

    0

    of a typical mid-sized hospital in Germany2

  • Single-use wrap

    0kg

    of polypropylene waste is generated each year2

  • Sterile containers

    0kg

    total annual waste quantity2

AESCULAP® rigid sterile containers result in 95% less waste than blue wrap.

Reduced waste, plus reduced costs

A strong argument can be made for such a switchover simply on the basis of its positive effects in connection with waste generation. But strikingly, the benefits of the rigid sterile container sterilization method also extend to costs.
 

Following the initial investment in new equipment for the rigid sterile container process, hospitals actually save money in their ongoing processing of sterile equipment for the OR.
 

  • In a US-based calculation, it has been estimated that a conversion to rigid sterile containers can save a medium size hospital up to $20K annually in disposable operating expenses and more than 150 hours in processing time. [1]
  • Similarly, a Germany-based study found that use of a sterilization container without an inner wrap was the most cost-effective option for processing of sterile equipment – with a per-use cost of €2.05 set sterilization as compared to €3.87 per set sterilization for two layers of single-use sterilization wrap. [2]

 

With a cost-benefit profile like this, it’s no surprise that more and more hospitals are taking the waste-reduction step of moving from single-use sterilization wrap to reusable rigid sterile containers.

More interesting facts about sterile packaging systems

AESCULAP Aicon®

Discover our rigid sterile container system.

Read more

Get in touch with our Sustainability Container Systems experts

Sustainability Container Systems contact form

[1] Practice Greenhealth. (2016). Implementation module: Rigid sterilization containers in the OR.

[2] Krohn, M.; Fengler, J.; Mickley, T.; Flessa, S. Analysis of processes and costs of alternative packaging options of sterile goods in hospitals – A case study in two German hospitals. Health Econ. Rev. 2019, 9, 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-018-0218-2

Stay connected with My B. Braun

With your personalized account, your online experience will be easier, more comfortable and safe.

person_outline My B. Braun